‘Angry’ WP president slams SA Rugby

WP president Zelt Marais believes SA Rugby was never really trying to assist the union after assuming administrative control.

‘Angry’ WP president slams SA Rugby

Earlier this year, SA Rugby invoked its constitutional power to take administrative control of the WPRFU, which controls 100% of its commercial arm, Western Province Professional Rugby.

READ | ROC NATION BOSS SAYS SA SPORTS INDUSTRY NEEDS SERIOUS SHAKE UP!

This followed months of controversy and infighting which brought the union to the brink of bankruptcy, while there were several attempts to have a vote of no confidence brought against the WP president.

However, in a letter addressed to SA Rugby and the WPRFU, Marais insisted that SA Rugby has no “justifiable grounds” for invoking the clause to take control of the WPRFU.

“The intervention of Saru by invoking Clause 29.5 was seen by me as a blessing in disguise in order to somehow bring stability to an embattled Executive Committee of the WPRFU. I, however, then and now was of the view that no substantive reasons and grounds existed for so invoking Clause 29.5,” wrote Marais.

“That is, that there were no legal and/or justifiable grounds for so invoking the said clause. One of the basic reasons for believing so was that prior to the invocation of the said clause a joint advisory sub-committee was set up comprising members of both Saru and WPRFU for the purpose of considering ways and means of getting WPRFU out of the minor financial woes it was facing at the time and also considering the number of deals on the table relating to equity in properties owned by the WPRFU.”

WP president says he was left mystified and angered

Marais went on to suggest the WPRFU had not received due credit for its commendable transformation record.

“WPRFU has an excellent record in terms of transformation, if not the best, and the feeling has emerged that possibly WPRFU is not enjoying the full support of Saru and its benefactors because of the level of transformation it has achieved. Be that as it may, it turned out that the aforementioned joint advisory committee did not act prudently and timeously as to ensure that the aforesaid deals could be satisfactorily concluded in order to avoid a financially embarrassing scenario for WPRFU.

“This both mystified and angered me as I felt that Saru was not really trying to assist the union in its trying times.

“By appearing to allow WPRFU to languish in its problems Saru then took a decision to invoke Clause 29.5. Fortuitously, after the invocation of Clause 29.5 Saru was able to come to the financial assistance of the union and make funds available to address the union’s short-term financial problems. Clearly, Saru should have adopted the stance that it would assist WPRFU with the aforesaid problems prior to placing it under administration, thereby avoiding a scenario that would hurt the union, as it is presently doing.”